Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights

31,104 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

A Commentary on “Evaluation of the in vitro Bioactivity of Bioceramics”

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 27 Jan 2010

Type: Short Commentary

Journal: Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights

Citation: Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights 2010:3 1-4

doi: 10.4137/BTRI.S4128

Abstract

The interesting article reported in Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights by Wu and Xiao entitled “Evaluation of the in vitro bioactivity of bioceramics” contrasts two methods (Simulated body fluid (SBF) and cell culture experiments) which have been commonly used to evaluate the in vitro bioactivity of bioceramics. Limitations in estimating the bioactivity of bioceramics using both methods have been reviewed. Therefore, Wu and Xiao suggest the combination of these two methods to evaluate the bioactivity of bioceramics can improve the screening efficiency for the selection of bioactive ceramics for bone regeneration.


Downloads

PDF  (779.59 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
Submitting a manuscript to LA was the most straightforward manuscript submission process that I have ever experienced. Review was fast, and the quality of the reviews was excellent. I highly recommend this publisher and would not hesitate to submit to them again.
Dr Leslie Sutherland (Hôpital Régional de Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results