Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

890,709 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

A Review of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium  for Renal Transplant Immunosuppression

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 07 Aug 2009

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Therapeutics 2009:1 927-933

Abstract

Mycophenolic acid inhibits an enzyme, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), blocking purine synthesis of lymphocytes and therefore functioning as an effective immunosuppressive agent in transplantation. Currently, there are two available forms of mycophenolic acid (MPA) available; mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated, delayed-release mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). Both products are approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection in renal transplant recipients. The use of MPA may be associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects which can lead to a reduction of the dose or discontinuation of therapy. Enteric-coated MPS was developed to reduce the upper gastrointestinal side effects due to its delayed release in the small intestines. Similar systemic MPA exposure is provided by oral administration of MMF 1000 mg daily and EC-MPS 720 mg, which contain near equimolar MPA content. Clinical trials in renal transplant recipients have demonstrated that EC-MPS is therapeutically equivalent to MMF when used at the time of transplantation and when used for conversion for gastrointestinal complications. The available literature regarding the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects and the impact on quality of life remains controversial. Prospective, randomized trials of the available MPA formulations are warranted to further explore the gastrointestinal adverse effect profiles.


Downloads

PDF  (527.22 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
I would like to thank the staff of Libertas Academica for their assistance in the publication process.  From the first e-mail to the final approval, each member of the staff has been friendly, helpful, and professional.  The whole process was seamless without any delays in processing of the manuscript.  I look forward to working with Libertas Academica again.
Dr Michael Stewart (Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinical Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results