Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics

167,916 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Antimicrobial Stewardship and the Treatment of Travelers’ Diarrhea: Is it Time to Re-think Recommendations?

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 25 Jun 2012

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics 2012:4 79-87

doi: 10.4137/CMRT.S1579

Abstract

Diarrhea is common among those visiting developing countries and is the most frequent travel related illness. Multiple guidelines suggest travelers’ diarrhea should be treated with antimicrobials. Self-treatment with antibiotics has been shown to shorten illness by 1–2 days but not without the potential risk of side effects. This treatment also needs to be balanced with the impact of antimicrobial pressure on the generation of resistance. In the era of antimicrobial stewardship, and with increasing global resistance among many different pathogens including those causing travelers' diarrhea, perhaps the recommendations for self-treatment should be re-examined. In this review we will examine the question; is the modest improvement in symptoms in an otherwise self-limiting illness worth the antimicrobial pressure?


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I am very pleased that I submitted my manuscript to Environmental Health Insights. The submission, review and publication were quick and fair.  I hope to submit further papers to the journal.  Thank you very much.
Dr Nguyen Minh Nui (Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Science, Toyama University, Japan)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results