Department of Pathology, Cancer Biomarkers Laboratory, Center for Pathology Informatics, Benedum Oncology Informatics Center bDepartment of Computer Science cDepartment of Surgery dDepartments of Medicine, Cell Biology & Physiology, and Human Genetics eClinical Proteomics Facility fUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute University of Pittsburgh
Abstract: Peptide profiles generated using SELDI/MALDI time of flight mass spectrometry provide a promising source of patientspecific information with high potential impact on the early detection and classification of cancer and other diseases. The new profiling technology comes, however, with numerous challenges and concerns. Particularly important are concerns of reproducibility of classification results and their significance. In this work we describe a computational validation framework, called PACE (Permutation-Achieved Classification Error), that lets us assess, for a given classification model, the significance of the Achieved Classification Error (ACE) on the profile data. The framework compares the performance statistic of the classifier on true data samples and checks if these are consistent with the behavior of the classifier on the same data with randomly reassigned class labels. A statistically significant ACE increases our belief that a discriminative signal was found in the data. The advantage of PACE analysis is that it can be easily combined with any classification model and is relatively easy to interpret. PACE analysis does not protect researchers against confounding in the experimental design, or other sources of systematic or random error.We use PACE analysis to assess significance of classification results we have achieved on a number of published data sets. The results show that many of these datasets indeed possess a signal that leads to a statistically significant ACE.
PDF (1.93 MB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
This is the first time for us to submit a manuscript to Cancer Informatics. We thank the peer reviewers for their insightful comments, which have improved our manuscript markedly. We were pleased to find that the staff were extremely helpful and kept us informed of the progress of the submission step-by-step. Our experience with Cancer Informatics has been tremendous. Thank you very much!