Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health

75,402 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Atosiban in the Management of Preterm Labour

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 27 Feb 2011

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health 2011:4 9-16

doi: 10.4137/CMWH.S5125

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to look at the evidence available for the use of atosiban as a tocolytic in cases of threatened preterm labour. A Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Green Top Guideline concluded that there was no clear evidence to show a benefit to tocolysis in reducing perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Using a systematic literature search, we summarise the evidence available on the use of atosiban for the prevention of preterm birth and compare it with other commonly used tocolytic agents in terms of efficacy, patient preference and drug safety. We conclude that although atosiban appears to be the tocolytic of choice, a clear benefit of using tocolysis in all cases of threatened preterm labour remains to be justified and clinical management should be tailored according to individual needs.


Downloads

PDF  (495.38 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
This is the first time I have published published an article in Clinical Medicine Insights Case Report.  I was pleased to find that the publishing staff were helpful in guiding my submission and I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication.
Dr Maria Gabriella Gentile (Niguarda Hospital Milan, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results