Close
Help
Need Help?



Corrections, Retractions and Expressions of Concern


On this page →

It is presumed that manuscripts report on work based on honest observations.  However occasionally information becomes available with may contradict this.  In such situations Libertas journals apply Committee on Publication Ethics guidelines on corrections, retractions and expressions of concern.

Errors in published papers may be identified requiring publication of a correction or erratum.  Errata are published on a numbered page and will contain the original article's citation.  Where an erratum is insufficient to address an error this will be dealt with on a case-by-case basis by the Editor in Chief.  Inadequacies arising from the normal course of new scientific research are not within the scope of this and will require no correction or withdrawal.

Where substantial doubt arises as to the honesty or integrity of a submitted or published article it is the Editor in Chief's responsibility to ensure that the matter is adequately addressed, usually by the authors' sponsoring institution.  It is not normally the Editor in Chief's responsibility to carry out the investigation or make a determination.  The Editor in Chief should be promptly informed of the decision of the sponsoring institution and a retraction printed should it be determined that a fradulent paper was published.  Alternatively, the Editor in Chief may choose to publish an expression of concern over aspects of the conduct or integrity of the work.

Retractions are published on a numbered page and contain the original article's citation. 

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My recent paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was the third I have published in a Libertas Academica journal.  Again, I was very pleased by the remarkable speed of publication. It took less than seven weeks from submission of the first manuscript version and two weeks from submission of the revision to the appearance of the final article.  When I had unforeseen problems with the transmission of proof corrections because of some software incompatibilities the ...
Dr Ruediger Hardeland (University of Goettingen, Germany)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results