Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports

664,147 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Bilateral Renal Infarction in a Lupus Patient: An Unusual Pathology

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 23 May 2013

Type: Case report

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports 2013:6 87-91

doi: 10.4137/CCRep.S11633

Abstract

Acute renal infarction is still an underdiagnosed pathology. Most cases are secondary to arterial embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation or other cardiac illnesses; however, a less known etiology is the vascular affection of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Renal infarction in lupus patients normally appears with positive antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant in the context of an antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This is characterized by a state of hypercoagulability potentially affecting all segments of the vascular bed with thrombosis. A differential diagnosis with lupus nephritis, a very common pathology in SLE patients, must be carried out.

We have to suspect this pathology in patients with SLE and APS who come to the emergency department complaining of abdominal pains or a renal colic.

We present the case of a 69-year-old woman who was diagnosed of bilateral segmental renal infarction in the context of recently diagnosed SLE with no other vascular manifestations.


Downloads

PDF  (1.50 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML






What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports
This is the first time I have published published an article in Clinical Medicine Insights Case Report.  I was pleased to find that the publishing staff were helpful in guiding my submission and I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication.
Dr Maria Gabriella Gentile (Niguarda Hospital Milan, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results