Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Cancer Informatics

874,343 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Blasted Cell Line Names

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 14 Oct 2010

Type: Short Report

Journal: Cancer Informatics

Citation: Cancer Informatics 2010:9 251-255

doi: 10.4137/CIN.S5613

Abstract

Background: While trying to integrate multiple data sets collected by different researchers, we noticed that the sample names were frequently entered inconsistently. Most of the variations appeared to involve punctuation, white space, or their absence, at the juncture between alphabetic and numeric portions of the cell line name.

Results: Reasoning that the variant names could be described in terms of mutations or deletions of character strings, we implemented a simple version of the Needleman-Wunsch global sequence alignment algorithm and applied it to the cell line names. All correct matches were found by this procedure. Incorrect matches only occurred when a cell line was present in one data set but not in the other. The raw match scores tended to be substantially worse for the incorrect matches.

Conclusions: A simple application of the Needleman-Wunsch global sequence alignment algorithm provides a useful first pass at matching sample names from different data sets.


Downloads

PDF  (435.58 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Cancer Informatics
Publishing in Cancer Informatics was the fastest publication I have ever experienced and has received the highest viewing rate.  So it is a great place to publish your very latest research.
Dr Yue Zhang (Boston, MA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results