Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Urology

31,394 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Clinical Use of Tolterodine Extended Release in Overactive Bladder

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 23 Apr 2012

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Urology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Urology 2012:6 1-9

doi: 10.4137/CMU.S6425

Abstract

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common problem whose prevalence increases with advancing age and compromises health-related quality of life. Tolterodine was the first antimuscarinic drug specifically designed to treat OAB.

Through MEDLINE, we reviewed articles, standardization reports and meeting abstracts, published between 2001 and 2011, on the efficacy and tolerability of Tolterodine extended release (ER). Our search terms included Tolterodine, extended release, overactive bladder, therapeutic use, efficacy, tolerance, and adverse events.

Tolterodine ER, via steady drug release during the daytime, gives the benefit of constant serum concentration and thus better efficacy and tolerability in comparison to Tolterodine immediate release, even in elderly patients with co-morbid conditions.


Downloads

PDF  (508.32 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
My experience with the review stages and manuscript processing in Cancer Growth and Metastasis has been of excellence. The fine balance of times utilized for proper scientific assessment of the material and quality control is greatly commended.
Dr Carlos Telleria (Sanford School of Medicine of The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results