Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Biomedical Informatics Insights

125,059 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Closing the Loop: Facilitating the Use of Autopsy Information in Medical Decision Making and Managed Care

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 23 Jul 2008

Journal: Biomedical Informatics Insights

Citation: Biomedical Informatics Insights 2008:1 21-28

Peter N. Nemetz

Strategy and Business Economics, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia.

Abstract

This paper advances the somewhat paradoxical hypothesis that the emergence of managed care which threatens to accelerate the decline of the autopsy may, in fact, offer an opportunity for its re-emergence as an important tool of quality and cost control. A simplified autopsy-based management information structure is proposed to close the loop where information currently gleaned from the autopsy is frequently unused or underutilized in medical decision making and managed care.


Downloads

PDF  (303.45 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Biomedical Informatics Insights
testimonial_image
It's a great experience publishing with Biomedical Informatics Insights. I am particularly impressed with the in-depth and constructive comments provided by the reviewers within such a short time-frame. The typesetting was not only prompt, but most importantly, effective. In fact, this was among the very few publication experiences that I have had when no correction was needed in the author proofs. I highly recommend Biomedical Informatics Insights to both readers and prospective ...
Dr Chun Hsi Huang (Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results