Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

622,968 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Efficacy and Tolerability of Pharmacotherapy Options for the Treatment of Medullary Thyroid Cancer

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 31 Oct 2012

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology 2012:6 355-362

doi: 10.4137/CMO.S8305

Abstract

Metastatic and unresectable medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is often difficult to treat as it is relatively unresponsive to radiation and conventional chemotherapy. This emphasizes the importance of the development of targeted therapies for advanced MTC. Vandetanib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of symptomatic or progressive MTC in patients with advanced disease in April 2011. This therapy proved to be a breakthrough in the management of MTC. We review the efficacy and safety of this novel treatment and other treatments that are being evaluated in this disease.


Downloads

PDF  (469.56 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
Publishing in  “Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology” was one of my best experience so far in an academic context. I found the process of going through submission, review, editing, and publication to be quite easy and most importantly, fair and efficient. I congratulate the team at Libertas Academica for a very well managed journal.
Dr E.I. Efremidou (Assistant Professor in Surgery, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Hellas)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results