Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Biomarkers in Cancer

50,565 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

EGFR and hTERT Expression as a Diagnostic Approach for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in High Risk Groups

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 08 Apr 2010

Type: Original Research

Journal: Biomarkers in Cancer

Citation: Biomarkers in Cancer 2010:2 57-63

doi: 10.4137/BIC.S3383

Abstract

Objective: The early detection of NSCLC is of importance because it provides chances for better outcomes. The aim of the study was to explore the clinical utility of EGFR and hTERT mRNA expression as markers for diagnosis of NSCLC.

Methods: EGFR and hTERT mRNA were quantified by quantative reverse transcription real time polymerase chain reaction in plasma of 45 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 40 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, selected by certain spiro-metric characteristics that made them at high risk of developing lung cancer in future.

Results: The gene expression level of each gene was calculated and given as a relative quantity—RQ. EGFR gene expression was found in all lung cancer patients. The mean level of expression was RQ = 29.39. hTERT mRNA could be detected in 88% of patients. The mean expression ratio in them was RQ = 17.31. Only 50% of the high risk patients turned to be positive for EGFR. The level of their expression was RQ = 2.09. The plasma levels of hTERT could be detected in 17 (42.5%) patients of the high risk COPD group. Their mean level of expression was RQ = 1.02. A statistically significant difference in EGFR and hTERT mRNA expression could be observed between the two groups of patients—p = 0.0001.

Conclusion: EGFR and hTERT mRNA are potential markers for lung cancer diagnosis, whose clinical importance should be replicated in a larger cohort of patients.


Downloads

PDF  (576.36 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Biomarkers in Cancer
Biomarkers in Cancer was prompt, focused and straight forward during the process. Guidance was available throughout the process. This has been one of the most enjoyable experiences in dealing with the staff of a journal publishing good quality science. It's amazing that one day you submit corrections and the next day you receive corrected proofs. And the process continues until you are completely satisfied. Amazing. The peer review process matched the standard of any international ...
Dr Faiz Nasim (Professor of Biochemistry, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results