Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Cancer Informatics

874,943 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Evaluating Microarray-based Classifiers: An Overview

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 29 Feb 2008

Journal: Cancer Informatics

Citation: Cancer Informatics 2008:6 77-97

A.-L. Boulesteix1, C. Strobl2, T. Augustin2 and M. Daumer1

1Sylvia Lawry Centre for MS Research (SLC), Hohenlindenerstr. 1, 81677 Munich, Germany. 2Department of Statistics, University of Munich (LMU), Ludwigstr. 33, 80539 Munich, Germany.

Abstract

For the last eight years, microarray-based class prediction has been the subject of numerous publications in medicine, bioinformatics and statistics journals. However, in many articles, the assessment of classification accuracy is carried out using suboptimal procedures and is not paid much attention. In this paper, we carefully review various statistical aspects of classifier evaluation and validation from a practical point of view. The main topics addressed are accuracy measures, error rate estimation procedures, variable selection, choice of classifiers and validation strategy.


Downloads

PDF  (1.72 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Cancer Informatics
Cancer Informatics has become an increasingly important source for research in the methodology of cancer genomics and the novel use of informatics technology. I have been impressed by the journal's contents and have been very gratified by the number of accesses to my recent publication. Cancer Informatics has filled an important gap in cancer research journals.
Dr Richard Simon (Chief, Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, USA )
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results