Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Vascular Health

99,807 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Exenatide: Review of its Role as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 05 Apr 2011

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Vascular Health

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Vascular Health 2011:3

doi: 10.4137/CMRVH.S1664

Abstract

Exenatide was the first glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist approved for treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clinical trials and real-world studies of exenatide, a subcutaneous injection given twice per day, indicate that it significantly reduces hemoglobin A1c values and weight with a low risk of hypoglycemia. Exenatide is generally well tolerated, but transient nausea and vomiting are commonly occurring side effects. Given this profile, exenatide has been shown to be cost effective relative to insulin glargine. Thus, exenatide is a treatment option that should be considered for patients with type 2 diabetes that is uncontrolled on one or more oral agents and for which additional weight gain and hypoglycemia are undesirable.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Vascular Health
Publishing in Clinical Medicine Reviews in Vascular Health was a pleasant experience. The process was fast and fair. The staff were very professional and we were well informed of the progress of the manuscript.
Dr Abd A Tahrani MD (Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University of Birmingham, UK)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results