Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research

Five Methods of Breast Volume Measurement: A Comparative Study of Measurements of Specimen Volume in 30 Mastectomy Cases

Submit a Paper

Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research 2011:5 43-52

Original Research

Published on 27 Mar 2011

DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S6128

Further metadata provided in PDF

Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research


Background: To compare breast volume measurement techniques in terms of accuracy, convenience, and cost.

Methods: Breast volumes of 30 patients who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy surgery were measured preoperatively by using five different methods (mammography, anatomic [anthropometric], thermoplastic casting, the Archimedes procedure, and the Grossman-Roudner device). Specimen volume after total mastectomy was measured in each patient with the water displacement method (Archimedes). The results were compared statistically with the values obtained by the five different methods.

Results: The mean mastectomy specimen volume was 623.5 (range 150–1490) mL. The breast volume values were established to be 615.7 mL (r = 0.997) with the mammographic method, 645.4 mL (r = 0.975) with the anthropometric method, 565.8 mL (r = 0.934) with the Grossman-Roudner device, 583.2 mL (r = 0.989) with the Archimedes procedure, and 544.7 mL (r = 0.94) with the casting technique. Examination of r values revealed that the most accurate method was mammography for all volume ranges, followed by the Archimedes method.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the most accurate method of breast volume measurement is mammography, followed by the Archimedes method. However, when patient comfort, ease of application, and cost were taken into consideration, the Grossman-Roudner device and anatomic measurement were relatively less expensive, and easier methods with an acceptable degree of accuracy.




BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


What Your Colleagues Say About Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research
I had a great experience publishing our paper in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research. The editorial team is very friendly and helpful. I was updated frequently during the entire review and publishing process. The review process is very reasonable and fair. The editor in charge has good judgement on review comments. I would recommend this journal to any researchers who conduct breast cancer research.
Dr Yanfen Hu (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

New article and journal news notification services