Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

1,049,038 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

FORS-D Analysis in P. falciparum can Differentiate Classes of Genes Under Selection

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 20 Mar 2011

Type: Original Research

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2011:7 21-29

doi: 10.4137/EBO.S6609

Abstract

FORS-D is a measure of the contribution of base order to the stem loop potential of a nucleic acid sequence and can also give information on evolutionary pressures on sequences to move away from secondary structure. Negative FORS-D values in a gene are associated with exons and nucleotide substitutions such as SNPs. An analysis of P. falciparum genes under selection pressure shows a correlation between negative FORS-D values and SNP density for genes that drug targets but not for drug transporters or antigenic variation genes. Analysis of the dhfr gene shows that a majority of rare mutations that associate with drug resistance also fall into regions with negative FORS-D values. These data suggest that FORS-D values might be predictors for drug target genes and drug resistance mutations in these genes.


Downloads

PDF  (551.39 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML






What Your Colleagues Say About Evolutionary Bioinformatics
This is the fastest progress we have experienced from submission to acceptance.  Reviews are fast, pertinent, and instructive.  Every step of the process is visible and prompt, and every email is friendly and immediate.  In all, it is an excellent experience to be published in Libertas Academica.
Dr Jiang Wang (Sun Yat sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results