Close
Help




JOURNAL

Cancer Informatics

Heterogeneity Between Ducts of the Same Nuclear Grade Involved by Duct Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast

Submit a Paper


Cancer Informatics 2010:9 209-216

Original Research

Published on 07 Sep 2010

DOI: 10.4137/CIN.S5505


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Cancer Informatics

Abstract

Purpose: Nuclear grade of breast DCIS is considered during patient management decision-making although it may have only a modest prognostic association with therapeutic outcome. We hypothesized that visual inspection may miss substantive differences in nuclei classified as having the same nuclear grade. To test this hypothesis, we measured subvisual nuclear features by quantitative image cytometry for nuclei with the same grade, and tested for statistical differences in these features.

Experimental design and statistical analysis: Thirty-nine nuclear digital image features of about 100 nuclei were measured in digital images of H&E stained slides of 81 breast biopsy specimens. One field with at least 5 ducts was evaluated for each patient. We compared features of nuclei with the same grade in multiple ducts of the same patient with ANOVA (or Welch test), and compared features of nuclei with the same grade in two ducts of different patients using 2-sided t-tests (P ≤ 0.05). Also, we compared image features for nuclei in patients with single grade to those with the same grade in patients with multiple grades using t-tests.

Results: Statistically significant differences were detected in nuclear features between ducts with the same nuclear grade, both in different ducts of the same patient, and between ducts in different patients with DCIS of more than one grade.

Conclusion: Nuclei in ducts visually described as having the same nuclear grade had significantly different subvisual digital image features. These subvisual differences may be considered additional manifestations of heterogeneity over and above differences that can be observed microscopically. This heterogeneity may explain the inconsistency of nuclear grading as a prognostic factor.



Downloads

PDF  (1.15 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




What Your Colleagues Say About Cancer Informatics
It is my pleasure to describe my positive experience with your journal. First of all, it is important to me as a corresponding author, to always be kept informed of every steps of publication processes. Further, responses from editorial team to my queries have been always prompt. Different suggestions provided by reviewers and editors are very insightful to improve the presentation of our work in different perspectives. Overall, I am willing absolutely to ...
Dr Jian Li (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services