Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics

167,405 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Iloperidone: Efficacy Review for the Acute Treatment of Schizophrenia in Adults

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 11 Jul 2011

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics 2011:3

doi: 10.4137/CMRT.S1538

Abstract

Iloperidone is one of the newest second generation antipsychotic medications approved in the United States for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Iloperidone binds tightly to serotonin-2A (5HT2A) and dopamine-2 (D2) receptors with very little affinity to histamine-1 (H1) and muscarinic-1,2 (M1–2) receptors. The efficacy of iloperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia has been established in three 6 week trials, one 4 week trial, and three 52-week follow-up studies. Iloperidone is generally well tolerated. The most common adverse effects observed in clinical studies of iloperidone are dizziness, weight gain, sedation, tachycardia, and orthostatic hypotension. This medication may serve as an additional treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
I have had nothing but positive experiences publishing with Libertas Academica.  The publication procedure is as quick and smooth as any I've encountered, and the peer review process is sufficiently rigorous that the reader can have complete confidence in the content of its journals.
Dr Michele A. Faulkner (Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results