Publication Date: 28 Feb 2007
Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics
Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2006:2 347-356
1Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, U.S.A. 2Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.; Current Address, NESCent, Durham, NC 27705, U.S.A.
Abstract: The utility of the matrix representation with flipping (MRF) supertree method has been limited by the speed of its heuristic algorithms. We describe a new heuristic algorithm for MRF supertree construction that improves upon the speed of the previous heuristic by a factor of n (the number of taxa in the supertree). This new heuristic makes MRF tractable for large-scale supertree analyses and allows the first comparisons of MRF with other supertree methods using large empirical data sets. Analyses of three published supertree data sets with between 267 to 571 taxa indicate that MRF supertrees are equally or more similar to the input trees on average than matrix representation with parsimony (MRP) and modified mincut supertrees. The results also show that large dif ferences may exist between MRF and MRP supertrees and demonstrate that the MRF supertree method is a practical and potentially more accurate alternative to the nearly ubiquitous MRP supertree method.
PDF (649.71 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
My co-authors and I had a very positive experience with the review and publication process in Evolutionary Bioinformatics. The reviewers were rapid and on point, and publication was also rapid after we made the necessary revisions.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube