Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Geriatrics

130,225 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Is there an Age Limit for Cardiac Surgery?

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 26 Sep 2008

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Geriatrics

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Geriatrics 2008:2 31-33

Malakh Shrestha, Nawid Khaladj, Hassina Baraki, Axel Haverich and Christian Hagl

Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Abstract

Introduction: This study was undertaken to analyze the risk of peri-operative mortality and morbidity after Cardiac Surgery with Cardio-pulmonary Bypass (CPB) in Patients above 85 years of age.

Patients and Methods: Between 1/2001 and 05/2005 thirty-nine patients   85 years of age at the time of surgery were examined. Median age was 87 years (85–92), 13 were males and 26 were females. 11 (28%) were urgent cases, and 4 (10%) considered as emergencies. 12 (32.5%) received CABG, 14 (35%) aortic valve replacement and in 10 (25%) a combination of the both was performed. The remaining had a combination of CABG with other operations.

Results: Peri-operative mortality was 7.7% (3 pts). All were in the emergency group. One of them went into the OR under cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and died in the OR. The other two were urgent cases who died later in the ICU due to cardiac failure. Temporary neurological dysfunction (TND) was found in 10.3% (4 pts) of the survivers. Mean mechanical ventilation time was 1.5 days, mean ICU stay was 3 days and mean hospital stay 9 days.

Conclusion: Cardiac surgery with CPB in Octogenarians can be performed with an acceptable mortality in elective patients, but is associated with a dismal outcome under emergency conditions.


Downloads

PDF  (170.82 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)






What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
As a new contributor, my experience publishing our article in Genetics and Epigenetics was extremely positive.  The reviewing process was prompt and fair (four reviewers examined our review article!) and then, the editorial office was very helpful by regularly updating me on the progression of the publication process.  I strongly recommend the journal to my colleagues in the field and hope that the journal will grow up and gain the notoriety it deserves in our ...
Dr Sylviane Muller (Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS, Strasbourg, France)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results