Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Biomedical Informatics Insights

120,646 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Submit a Paper




Editor in Chief

John P. Pestian

John P. Pestian, Ph.D. is an associate professor of pediatrics and biomedical engineering at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati. He directs the Computational Medicine Center, a collaborative of healthcare, university and private industry members that was funded by Ohio's Third Frontier program.

Dr. Pestian's lab (pestianlab.cchmc.org) is focused on analyzing clinical free-text using a variety of natural language processing methods. The lab is using this free text in a variety of way to advance personalized medicine like combining it with genomic, clinical and environmental data to select optimal drugs, identify various patient risk factors and do quality enhancement monitoring.

>> Dr Pestian's latest call for papers

profile details Email Address: Twitter: http://twitter.com/Biomedicaljourn



Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Biomedical Informatics Insights
testimonial_image
It's a great experience publishing with Biomedical Informatics Insights. I am particularly impressed with the in-depth and constructive comments provided by the reviewers within such a short time-frame. The typesetting was not only prompt, but most importantly, effective. In fact, this was among the very few publication experiences that I have had when no correction was needed in the author proofs. I highly recommend Biomedical Informatics Insights to both readers and prospective ...
Dr Chun Hsi Huang (Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results