Need Help?


Magnetic Resonance Insights

177,429 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Is this journal right for my paper?

Ask Editor in Chief
Submit a Paper

Editor in Chief: Sendhil Velan

Aims & Scope: Magnetic Resonance Insights is an international, open access peer reviewed journal which covers all... more

Indexing & Databases: Chemical Abstracts Service, Chinese Electronic Periodical Service, Directory of Open Access Journals, EBSCO Academic Search Complete, Gale Academic OneFile, Gale Health Reference Centre, Gale InfoTrac Custom Journals, Index Copernicus, OAlster, ProQuest SciTech, ProQuest Technology, Socolar

Journal Directories: Academic Journals Database, EBSCO A-Z, HINARI, JournalSeek, JournalTOCs, OAJSE, Scirus, Ulrich's Periodicals

Processing Speed: Blind peer review by minimum of two expert reviewers and independent editorial decision within three to four weeks. Publication within average four weeks following acceptance.

ISSN: 1178-623X

Signup for Email Alerts and keep in touch with Magnetic Resonance Insights journal news, updates, events and articles

Article Search

Page 1 of 1

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing: 3-4 Weeks
    to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
What Your Colleagues Say About Magnetic Resonance Insights
It was a pleasure to work with your editorial board.  Responses were extremely rapid and very useful.  You must be the most e-literate journal with which I have interacted with, and that is many, including the big guys.  I am proud to have our  review published in Magnetic Resonance Insights.
Dr Ian CP Smith (Innovative Biodiagnostics Inc., Winnipeg, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.

Author Survey Results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results