Publication Date: 16 May 2008
Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
Citation: Clinical Medicine: Gastroenterology 2008:1 21-26
1Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. 2Department of Public Health and Center for Asian Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
Objective: To assess Chinese American primary care physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and barriers to recommending colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to their Chinese American patients.
Methods: Chinese American primary care physicians serving Chinese American patients in two metropolitan areas were invited to complete a mailed survey on CRC screening knowledge, attitudes toward shared decision making and CRC screening, and CRC screening recommendation patterns.
Results: About half of the 56 respondents did not know CRC incidence and mortality figures for Chinese Americans. Those aged 50 and younger, graduating from U.S. medical schools, or working in non-private settings had higher knowledge scores (p < 0.01). Physicians graduating from U.S. medical schools had more favorable attitudes toward shared decision making (p < 0.01). Lack of health insurance, inconsistent guidelines, and insufficient time were the most frequently cited barriers to recommending CRC screening.
Conclusions: Most Chinese American physicians had knowledge, attitude, and communication barriers to making optimal CRC screening recommendations.
PDF (219.95 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
The review process in Libertas Academica journals is prompt, objective and rigorous. The entire process is smooth and clear and all the editorial staff are cooperative and professional. Published papers are of top clinical and scientific value, and high metrics reflect the excellent quality of Libertas Academica's journals.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube