Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology

101,391 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Knowledge, Perceptions, and Communication about Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese American Primary Care Physicians

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 16 May 2008

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Gastroenterology 2008:1 21-26

Wenchi Liang1, Mei-Yuh Chen1, Grace X. Ma2 and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt1

1Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. 2Department of Public Health and Center for Asian Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Abstract

Objective:  To assess Chinese American primary care physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and barriers to recommending colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to their Chinese American patients.

Methods:  Chinese American primary care physicians serving Chinese American patients in two metropolitan areas were invited to complete a mailed survey on CRC screening knowledge, attitudes toward shared decision making and CRC screening, and CRC screening recommendation patterns.

Results:  About half of the 56 respondents did not know CRC incidence and mortality figures for Chinese Americans. Those aged 50 and younger, graduating from U.S. medical schools, or working in non-private settings had higher knowledge scores (p < 0.01). Physicians graduating from U.S. medical schools had more favorable attitudes toward shared decision making (p < 0.01). Lack of health insurance, inconsistent guidelines, and insufficient time were the most frequently cited barriers to recommending CRC screening.

Conclusions:  Most Chinese American physicians had knowledge, attitude, and communication barriers to making optimal CRC screening recommendations.


Downloads

PDF  (219.95 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The review process in Libertas Academica journals is prompt, objective and rigorous.  The entire process is smooth and clear and all the editorial staff are cooperative and professional.  Published papers are of top clinical and scientific value, and high metrics reflect the excellent quality of Libertas Academica's journals.
Dr Antoine Kossaify (USEK NDS University Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results