Help
Posted Thu, Dec, 20,2012
Primary Prevention Insights has formally joined the Committee on Publishing Ethics.COPE provides guidelines that are applied in situations such as where plagiarism allegations are made against a paper. By becoming a COPE member there can be no doubt amongst authors of questionable papers that journals will apply commonly accepted industry-standard guidelines. In more difficult cases Ed...
Continue Reading →Posted Wed, Dec, 19,2012
Libertas encourages readers to register to join the Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine peer review group. Being a volunteer peer reviewer is a great way to support Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine and assist your colleagues who have submitted manuscripts to the journal.The peer review process has been designe...
Continue Reading →Posted in: Processing Speed and Quality
Posted Tue, Dec, 18,2012
Libertas encourages readers to register to join the Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology peer review group. Being a volunteer peer reviewer is a great way to support Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology and assist your colleagues who have submitted manuscripts to the journal.The peer review process has been designed to make this vital task as quick and well-organized as possible so rev...
Continue Reading →Posted in: Processing Speed and Quality
Posted Tue, Dec, 18,2012
Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry has formally joined the Committee on Publishing Ethics.COPE provides guidelines that are applied in situations such as where plagiarism allegations are made against a paper. By becoming a COPE member there can be no doubt amongst authors of questionable papers that journals will apply commonly accepted industry-standard guidelines. In more difficult ...
Continue Reading →Posted Fri, Dec, 14,2012
Particle Physics Insights has formally joined the Committee on Publishing Ethics.COPE provides guidelines that are applied in situations such as where plagiarism allegations are made against a paper. By becoming a COPE member there can be no doubt amongst authors of questionable papers that journals will apply commonly accepted industry-standard guidelines. In more difficult cases Edit...
Continue Reading →Posted Fri, Dec, 14,2012
Libertas frequently receives positive feedback from authors publishing in our journals. We ask authors to provide their feedback on the publishing process to assess our performance and offer potential authors an insight into what it’s like working with us.Testimonials are usually journal specific but often address broader subjects like article visibility and processing speed.Here are three o...
Continue Reading →Posted in: TestimonialsProcessing Speed and Quality
News Categories
The staff of Libertas Academica have been exceptionally easy to work with. They continually keep authors updated and are responsive to all requests. They were also very flexible to work with when I had some challenges from my end as an author. Article reviews were received very promptly and were constructive and helpful for improving the manuscript. The online submission system was easy to use and provided clear guidance on what was needed. I highly ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube