Close
Help
Need Help?



Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine Now on JournalTOCs and 9 Other Directories

Posted Tue, Oct, 30,2012

Libertas is pleased to announce that Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine is now included in the JournalTOCs (Journal Tables of Contents) directory and content is available through the website now.JournalTOCs contains metadata from over 17,000 journals collected from almost 1,000 international publishers. The directory is free for anyone to browse the latest ...

Continue Reading →

Join the Biomarkers in Cancer Peer Reviewer Community

Posted Tue, Oct, 30,2012

Libertas encourages readers to register to join the Biomarkers in Cancer peer review group.  Being a volunteer peer reviewer is a great way to support Biomarkers in Cancer and assist your colleagues who have submitted manuscripts to the journal.The peer review process has been designed to make this vital task as quick and well-organized as possible so reviewers’ time is used efficiently...

Continue Reading →

Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology Email Alerts

Posted Tue, Oct, 30,2012

A key component of Libertas' high quality service to Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology authors and readers is the free email alerts service, which keeps recipients updated on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology newly published articles and journal news.Email alerts recipients receive short, plain text notifications whenever a new article is published.  Notifica...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Libertas Services

Pubmed and Open Access Visibility in Bioinformatics and Biology Insights

Posted Tue, Oct, 30,2012

Articles published in open access journals like Bioinformatics and Biology Insights are more visible and likely to receive more citations than articles published in restricted access journals.During September, Pubmed Central statistics showed that Libertas Academica has 1,474 papers available for anyone to download for free. These papers received 39,104 views, including 9,215 downloads. The most p...

Continue Reading →

New Biomarker Insights Call for Papers

Posted Tue, Oct, 30,2012

The Editor in Chief, Dr Stephen F Kingsmore, is pleased to announce a new call for papers for Biomarker Insights. Submissions are being accepted now.All authors who submit their manuscripts to Libertas will benefit from:Professional Manuscript EditingConvenient 3-step online manuscript submissionNo space restrictions or color figure chargesOptional immediate publicationInclusion of your article in...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Calls for Papers

Journals Host Up to 50 MB of Supplementary Files

Posted Tue, Oct, 30,2012

Libertas journals now host up to 50 MB of supplementary files per article, more than double what other publishers allow.Authors can include large collections of tables, figures and source code.  Strengthen the credibility of your work by allowing your colleagues to verify your results by including all your data.Supplementary files will also be permanently archived by CLOCKSS, LOCKSS and o...

Continue Reading →

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
Working with the editorial staff and reviewers for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was a positive experience.  The online submission/revision process was easy and staff were readily available to answer any questions.  Reviewers were knowledgeable, lending expert comments that allowed for improvement in content information.  I highly recommend others practitioners and researchers to consider Libertas Academica journals for their next publication.
LaNeigh Harkness (Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results