Close
Help
Need Help?



What Authors Say About Gene Regulation and Systems Biology

Posted Tue, Aug, 07,2012

Looking for proof that Gene Regulation and Systems Biology offers an excellent publishing experience?  Take a few moments to read what your colleagues who have published in this journal have said about it.Dr Clark D Jeffries recently said:"The reviewing and editorial management of our paper was timely, thorough, and systematic.  In particular the reviewers' comments resulted in ...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Testimonials

Gene Regulation and Systems Biology Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Tue, Aug, 07,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Gene Regulation and Systems Biology was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.190.Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is ve...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Impact Factors

Ways to Follow Latest Articles

Posted Tue, Aug, 07,2012

We offer a selection of ways to follow our journals.  We invite readers to choose the channels that best suit their needs, while authors can be certain that their papers will be widely announced when published.Email Our email services are the fastest way to get the latest updates.  Our journal and subject opt-in email alerts announce new and forthcoming articles within hours of publicati...

Continue Reading →

Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly Added to Gale Academic OneFile

Posted Mon, Aug, 06,2012

Libertas is pleased to announce that Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly has now been added to Gale's Academic OneFile database.GALE operates more than 600 databases, including the popular InfoTrac and General Reference series. The Michigan based company is popular with authors working in the USA, so inclusion of Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly in GALE's Acade...

Continue Reading →

Clinical Medicine Insights: Pathology Joins COPE

Posted Mon, Aug, 06,2012

Clinical Medicine Insights: Pathology has formally joined the Committee on Publishing Ethics.COPE provides guidelines that are applied in situations such as where plagiarism allegations are made against a paper.  By becoming a COPE member there can be no doubt amongst authors of questionable papers that journals will apply commonly accepted industry-standard guidelines.  In more difficul...

Continue Reading →

Nutrition and Metabolic Insights Email Alerts

Posted Mon, Aug, 06,2012

A key component of Libertas' high quality service to Nutrition and Metabolic Insights authors and readers is the free email alerts service, which keeps recipients updated on Nutrition and Metabolic Insights newly published articles and journal news.Email alerts recipients receive short, plain text notifications whenever a new article is published.  Notifications are also provided for fort...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Libertas Services

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The submission and publishing process was a good experience.  During the last few weeks from the submission to publication I have worked with high quality staff.  In my opinion, the easy communication was the most important characteristic of Libertas and an important influence on the final quality of the article.  I definitely recommend the publisher to my co-workers.
Dr Reinhardt Pinzon (Universidad Tecnologica de Panama, Panama)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results