Close
Help
Need Help?



Bioinformatics and Biology Insights Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Tue, Aug, 28,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Bioinformatics and Biology Insights was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.809.Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is ve...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Impact Factors

Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Mon, Aug, 27,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.250.Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is ve...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Impact Factors

Cancer Informatics Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Mon, Aug, 13,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Cancer Informatics was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.6406.Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is very impressive.Ca...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Impact Factors

Gene Regulation and Systems Biology Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Tue, Aug, 07,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Gene Regulation and Systems Biology was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.190.Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is ve...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Impact Factors

Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Wed, Aug, 01,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.000.Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is v...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Impact Factors

Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology Unofficial Impact Factor Update

Posted Mon, Jun, 25,2012

The unofficial impact factor for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.000.Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is v...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Impact Factors

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.  Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science.  The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized.  I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal.
Dr Sharilyn Almodovar (University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results