Close
Help
Need Help?



Survey Results on Speed and Efficiency

Posted Tue, Feb, 12,2013

We survey all authors after their articles are published in our journals.  We ask them to rate various aspects of their experience to ensure that we're meeting our commitments to them. 

It's been great to learn that 96% of authors surveyed rated speed and efficiency of manuscript processing in Libertas journals as good or very good!  

Continue Reading →

Never Miss Another New Article Announcement

Posted Fri, Feb, 08,2013

Sign up for our email alerts service to ensure that you never miss another new article notification.  Select only the journals or subject areas that interest you.  You'll receive no more than one email per day.  Unsubscribe at any time.Email alerts will be delivered to your email inbox each morning when a new paper has been published.  To learn more and sign up visit this p...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Libertas Services

Libertas joins IPG

Posted Thu, Jan, 24,2013

We're pleased to announce our latest new industry membership: the Independent Publishers Guild.  The IPG is 51 years old and has more than 560 members around the world.  We look forward to working with out IPG members and contributing to this dynamic organisation.  Libertas is also a member of these respected international organisations:  -- Assocation of Learned and Profes...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Authors

What's a Tumblr?

Posted Wed, Jan, 16,2013

Tumblrs are a relatively new innovation in social media.  Unlike other manifestations of social media Tumblrs focusses primarily on images.  Libertas joined Tumblr relatively recently with the aim of establishing whether it was an effective channel to disseminate newly published papers.  The results so far have been promising.  At the time of writing our Tumblr had over 13,000 ...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Social Media

The Five Things Reviewers Wish Authors Would Do

Posted Mon, Jan, 14,2013

It’s no exaggeration to write that volunteer peer reviewers are the foundation of scholarly communication.  The contributions they make are enormous but the nature of the conventional independent blind peer review process means that these contributions are rarely fully understood.  As a publisher I see this on a daily basis.  After a peer review report is compiled and an edito...

Continue Reading →

Follow Libertas on Facebook

Posted Thu, Jan, 03,2013

Facebook users can now follow Libertas on Facebook and stay updated on all the latest developments through their news feed.Our Facebook contains interviews with your colleagues, videos abstracts created by authors and the most important journal news items, together with a once-weekly digest of articles published.  Comment on and share posts with your colleagues. Facebook is also a great way t...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Social Media

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I find Ophthalmology and Eye Diseases very author-friendly. As a first time author publishing in this journal I experienced close attention to authors, prompt and close co-operation in all phases of production of my manuscript encouraging. Your excellent staff simplified a daunting process that often makes authors just give up on publication due to unwarranted and irrational complexities, with close guidance to produce high quality work.
Dr Michael Okosa (Consultant Ophthalmologist and Head, Department of Ophthalmology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital and Head Guinness Eye Centre, Onitsha, Nigeria)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results