Close
Help
Need Help?



Join the Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights Peer Reviewer Community

Posted Tue, Nov, 13,2012

Libertas encourages readers to register to join the Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights peer review group.  Being a volunteer peer reviewer is a great way to support Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights and assist your colleagues who have submitted manuscripts to the journal.The peer review process has been designed to make this vital task as quick and well-organized as possible so reviewe...

Continue Reading →

Join the Cancer Growth and Metastasis Peer Reviewer Community

Posted Mon, Nov, 12,2012

Libertas encourages readers to register to join the Cancer Growth and Metastasis peer review group.  Being a volunteer peer reviewer is a great way to support Cancer Growth and Metastasis and assist your colleagues who have submitted manuscripts to the journal.The peer review process has been designed to make this vital task as quick and well-organized as possible so reviewers’ time is ...

Continue Reading →

Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemias Joins COPE

Posted Mon, Nov, 12,2012

Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemias has formally joined the Committee on Publishing Ethics.COPE provides guidelines that are applied in situations such as where plagiarism allegations are made against a paper.  By becoming a COPE member there can be no doubt amongst authors of questionable papers that journals will apply commonly accepted industry-standard guidelines.  In more dif...

Continue Reading →

New Author Endorsement for Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports

Posted Mon, Nov, 12,2012

Dr Lucio Gnessi from Sapienza University of Rome, Italy writes about the experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports:"My experience with Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports was excellent.  The entire review process was fast and accurate.  My previous experience with important top ranking journals was unpleasant mainly because the staff were slow and someti...

Continue Reading →

Lipid Insights Joins COPE

Posted Thu, Nov, 08,2012

Lipid Insights has formally joined the Committee on Publishing Ethics.COPE provides guidelines that are applied in situations such as where plagiarism allegations are made against a paper.  By becoming a COPE member there can be no doubt amongst authors of questionable papers that journals will apply commonly accepted industry-standard guidelines.  In more difficult cases Editors in Chie...

Continue Reading →

Journal of Genomes and Exomes Joins COPE

Posted Wed, Nov, 07,2012

Journal of Genomes and Exomes has formally joined the Committee on Publishing Ethics.COPE provides guidelines that are applied in situations such as where plagiarism allegations are made against a paper.  By becoming a COPE member there can be no doubt amongst authors of questionable papers that journals will apply commonly accepted industry-standard guidelines.  In more difficult cases ...

Continue Reading →

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
I consider that working with you has been the most interesting and friendly process I have experienced publishing.  The staff have been very supportive to me, quickly addressing every concern I had.  The whole process from the arrival of manuscript to the publication is the fastest I´ve ever experienced, and is very convenient for authors.  The staff kept us informed about the whole rigorous process step by step which is a great advantage ...
Professor Esther Uña Cidón (Professor of Oncology/Palliative Medicine, Oncology Department, Clinical University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine of Valladolid, Spain)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results