Close
Help
Need Help?



What Authors Say About Gene Regulation and Systems Biology

Posted Tue, Aug, 07,2012

Looking for proof that Gene Regulation and Systems Biology offers an excellent publishing experience?  Take a few moments to read what your colleagues who have published in this journal have said about it.Dr Clark D Jeffries recently said:"The reviewing and editorial management of our paper was timely, thorough, and systematic.  In particular the reviewers' comments resulted in ...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Testimonials

Authors Endorse High-Quality of Libertas Journals

Posted Mon, Aug, 06,2012

Libertas provides among the highest quality publishing experiences available for authors.Prior to acceptance all papers are subject to peer review and editorial decisions made by leading experts in their fields.  Many authors acknowledge the positive contribution made by peer reviewers by thanking them in the contributions section of their paper.After acceptance all papers are professionally ...

Continue Reading →

Author Testimonials for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

Posted Wed, Aug, 01,2012

Libertas asks authors of papers in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology to provide feedback on their publishing experience. We do this to ensure that all authors are satisfied with our service, and so we know if there are any areas we can improve on.Dr Huang from the University of Kansas recently provided the following testimonial for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology:“The editors were ex...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Testimonials

New Author Endorsement for Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes

Posted Mon, Jul, 09,2012

Dr Pooja Raghavan from Mount Carmel Health in Columbus, Ohio writes about the experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes:"Publishing with Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes was a great experience.  The editors were prompt in updating me with information regarding the status of the manuscript, and answering all questions I had durin...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Testimonials

Testimonials from Libertas Authors

Posted Wed, Jun, 13,2012

Libertas frequently receives positive feedback from authors publishing in our journals. We ask authors to provide their feedback on the publishing process to assess our performance and offer potential authors an insight into what it’s like working with us. Testimonials are usually journal specific but often address broader subjects like article visibility and processing speed. Here are t...

Continue Reading →

New Author Endorsement for Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports

Posted Thu, May, 31,2012

Dr Filomena Carvalho from Universidade de Sao Paulo in Sao Paulo, Brazil writes about the experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports:"The process of submission and publishing was a great experience.  During the few weeks from the submission to publication I have worked with high quality staff.  In my opinion, the easy communication was the most important chara...

Continue Reading →

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
We found Bioinformatics and Biology insights very supportive and quick in guiding us in submitting our manuscript.  The review of the manuscript was also very prompt.  We also found that the review was fair and prompt and that was the most important thing for us. It was a very interesting experience for us. We also liked the video abstract service, which is very novel and encouraging for authors.
Dr S. Krishakumar (Vision Research Foundation, India)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results