Close
Help
Need Help?



Interview with Cancer Informatics author Dr Jason B. Nikas

Posted Thu, Nov, 10,2011

Dr Nikas is co-author of Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, recently published in Cancer Informatics.  We asked Dr Nikas to tell us about the background to the paper.To start please tell us about the genesis of your paper.  Why did you consider it to be important that it should be written?  How does it advance e...

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Authors

Published Author Endorses Biomedical Informatics Insights

Posted Wed, Jul, 13,2011

In a recent testimonial for Biomedical Informatics Insights, Dr Chun Hsi Huang comments on the high quality of the peer review report, speed and typesetting quality he experienced with his recently published article:"It's a great experience publishing with Biomedical Informatics Insights. I am particularly impressed with the in-depth and constructive comments provided by the reviewers wit...

Continue Reading →

High Article Visibility in Open Access Journals

Posted Tue, Jun, 28,2011

Libertas' open access journals provide papers published in them with very high visibility compared with traditional controlled access journals.  Papers are also accessible throughout the world, preventing access barriers caused by international economic disparities.An example of this high visibility is Relationship Between the Plasma Concentration of C-Reactive Protein and Severity of Per...

Continue Reading →

Published Author Endorses Translational Oncogenomics

Posted Mon, Jun, 27,2011

In a recent testimonial for Translational Oncogenomics, Dr Joseph Zaretsky comments on the efficient manuscript processing and high quality of the peer review report of his recently published article:"As an author of a review published in Translational Oncogenomics, I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The entire submission, review and publication process was eas...

Continue Reading →

Published Author Endorses Cancer Informatics

Posted Tue, Jun, 21,2011

In a recent testimonial for Cancer Informatics, Dr Seppo Karrila comments on the speed, quality and visibility of his recently published article:"Compared with other journals we considered for publishing, Cancer Informatics provided extremely rapid but quality turnaround from draft submission to a flawlessly typeset final publication.  Moreover, sharing the article is now as easy as shar...

Continue Reading →

Environmental Health Insights Paper Awarded Editor's Choice Endorsment

Posted Thu, Jun, 09,2011

The Editor in Chief of Environmental Health Insights, Dr Timothy Kelley, has awarded an endorsement to Health, Climate Change and Sustainability: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature.In the endorsement the Editor in Chief writes:This article has been selected for endorsement due to its comprehensive literature review of climate change and its effects on health and sustainabi...

Continue Reading →

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My recent paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was the third I have published in a Libertas Academica journal.  Again, I was very pleased by the remarkable speed of publication. It took less than seven weeks from submission of the first manuscript version and two weeks from submission of the revision to the appearance of the final article.  When I had unforeseen problems with the transmission of proof corrections because of some software incompatibilities the ...
Dr Ruediger Hardeland (University of Goettingen, Germany)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results