Posted Mon, Mar, 05,2012
Libertas encourages readers to register to join the Clinical Medicine Insights: Blood Disorders peer review group. Being a volunteer peer reviewer is a great way to support Clinical Medicine Insights: Blood Disorders and assist your colleagues who have submitted manuscripts to the journal.
The peer review process has been designed to make this vital task as quick and well-organized as possible so reviewers’ time is used efficiently. This means that reviewers can focus on assessing papers rather than navigating obstructive web interfaces.
We survey our peer reviewers to maintain an understanding of their perspective on the peer review process. The feedback from peer reviewers has been overwhelmingly positive:
Dr Sharilyn Almodovar says: "I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science. The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized. I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal."
Dr Ajay K. Nooka says: "It was a pleasure and honor to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica. The review process is extremely streamlined and seems effortless; at the same time yielding high quality material. Great balance."
Posted in: Processing Speed and Quality
Thu 17 Jul, 2014Professional Integrity in Scholarly Publishing
Thu 17 Jul, 2014Published Recently (7th July– 18th July)
Tue 15 Jul, 2014New Editor in Chief - Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health
I am definitely impressed by the manner with which Libertas Academica handled the publication of our research paper. The prompt reviews and other processes involved is a credit to the competence and experience of staff of Libertas Academica. Most outstanding is the friendly communications from the staff which kept us informed all the way through, providing guidance on our submission as it passed through a most rigorous peer review. I would recommend Libertas ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2014 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)