Posted Tue, Mar, 06,2012
Articles published in open access journals like Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology have been shown to receive more citations than articles published in restricted access journals.
A recent review of the studies on open access citation advantage found that 87% of previous research showed open access articles to be more often cited than restricted access articles. An article’s citation level gives a good indication of its visibility and impact, and in some subject areas open access papers received 600% more citations than restricted access papers.
The mean difference in citations was 176.75% in favour of open access, meaning papers published in open access journal almost always get a considerable citation advantage over those published in restricted access journals.
During February, Pubmed Central statistics showed that Libertas Academica has 1,259 papers available for anyone to download for free. These papers received 34,717 views, including 9,033 downloads. The most popular paper was viewed 808 times during the month. Including abstracts, figures, tables, supplementary data, and cited-in lists, Libertas material on the Pubmed Central website was viewed 52,778 times.
Fri 06 Dec, 2013Lipoprotein Glomerulopathy
Fri 06 Dec, 2013Serum-Derived Bovine Immunoglobulin Protein Isolates and IBS-D
Fri 06 Dec, 2013A Successful Year for Libertas Journals
It was a pleasure working with you after you requested me to review a paper. The manuscript that I reviewed was very well written and very interesting. Considering that it is an open journal with an international audience and that the process of publication is very fast I would strongly recommend Libertas Academica. I am looking forward to reviewing future manuscripts for Liberta Academica and submitting my own results in the future. ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)