Posted Tue, Mar, 06,2012
Articles published in open access journals like Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology have been shown to receive more citations than articles published in restricted access journals.
A recent review of the studies on open access citation advantage found that 87% of previous research showed open access articles to be more often cited than restricted access articles. An article’s citation level gives a good indication of its visibility and impact, and in some subject areas open access papers received 600% more citations than restricted access papers.
The mean difference in citations was 176.75% in favour of open access, meaning papers published in open access journal almost always get a considerable citation advantage over those published in restricted access journals.
During February, Pubmed Central statistics showed that Libertas Academica has 1,259 papers available for anyone to download for free. These papers received 34,717 views, including 9,033 downloads. The most popular paper was viewed 808 times during the month. Including abstracts, figures, tables, supplementary data, and cited-in lists, Libertas material on the Pubmed Central website was viewed 52,778 times.
Visit the Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology homepage and view more statistics here
News Categories
Mon 20 May, 2013
Measuring Restriction Sizes Using DWIMon 20 May, 2013
Ozone Dose: Rest versus ExerciseMon 20 May, 2013
Genetic Risk Score Based Association AnalysisIt's been a great experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. I'm really impressed with the high quality, professional and constructive of peer review in the short time-frame. The editorial team is very helpful and I always received quick answers when I had questions. I am glad to have worked with Libertas Academica and I highly recommend publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube