Close
Help
Need Help?



Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Indexing Partners

Posted Thu, Apr, 26,2012

Libertas works continually to increase online visibility for all our journals, and we are pleased to report that Journal of Central Nervous System Disease is now indexed by 10 external online databases and in 6 online directories and search engines.

Indexing with so many external databases and directories means that articles published in Journal of Central Nervous System Disease are searchable in many places, meaning they are more visible to more researchers around the world.

This is the full list of indexes and directories for Journal of Central Nervous System Disease:

Indexes

  • Chemical Abstracts Service

  • Chinese Electronic Periodical Service

  • EBSCO CINAHL Complete

  • Gale Academic OneFile

  • Gale Health Reference Centre

  • Gale InfoTrac Custom journals

  • Google Scholar

  • Index Copernicus

  • OAlster

  • Socolar

Directories

  • EBSCO A-Z

  • JournalTOCs

  • OAJSE

  • Pubshub

  • Scirus

  • Ulrich's Periodicals

Visit the Journal of Central Nervous System Disease homepage and view the Editor in Chief’s call for papers

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I found that publishing my paper in Signal Transduction Insights was a very satisfying experience. The submission process was  simple, review rapid and thorough and the appearance of the article was first rate. I recommend this journal.
Dr Stuart K Calderwood (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results