Posted Tue, May, 01,2012
Articles published in open access journals like Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine have been shown to receive more citations than articles published in restricted access journals.
A recent review of the studies on open access citation advantage found that 87% of previous research showed open access articles to be more often cited than restricted access articles. An article’s citation level gives a good indication of its visibility and impact, and in some subject areas open access papers received 600% more citations than restricted access papers.
The mean difference in citations was 176.75% in favour of open access, meaning papers published in open access journal almost always get a considerable citation advantage over those published in restricted access journals.
During March, Pubmed Central statistics showed that Libertas Academica has 1,259 papers available for anyone to download for free. These papers received 33,210 views, including 8,851 downloads. The most popular paper was viewed 731 times during the month. Including abstracts, figures, tables, supplementary data, and cited-in lists, Libertas material on the Pubmed Central website was viewed 50,777 times.
Visit the Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine homepage and view more statistics here
News Categories
Fri 17 May, 2013
Ophthalmology and Eye Disease Now on PubMedFri 17 May, 2013
RNAi Stratagems Against HIV-1Thu 16 May, 2013
Journal of Central Nervous System Disease on PubMedIt is an absolute pleasure serving as a peer reviewer for Libertas Academia. The review process was efficient and easy to navigate. I appreciate the personal reminder and you promptly sending me the materials via email for my convenience.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube