Close
Help
Need Help?
Search



Japanese Clinical Medicine Indexing Partners

Posted Wed, May, 02,2012

Libertas works continually to increase online visibility for all our journals, and we are pleased to report that Japanese Clinical Medicine is now indexed by 8 external online databases and in 5 online directories and search engines.

Indexing with so many external databases and directories means that articles published in Japanese Clinical Medicine are searchable in many places, meaning they are more visible to more researchers around the world.

This is the full list of indexes and directories for Japanese Clinical Medicine:

Indexes

  • Chinese Electronic Periodical Service

  • EBSCO Academic Search Complete

  • Gale Academic OneFile

  • Gale Health Reference Centre

  • Gale InfoTrac Custom journals

  • Google Scholar

  • Index Copernicus

  • ProQuest Health & Medical Complete

Directories

  • EBSCO A-Z

  • JournalTOCs

  • OAJSE

  • Scirus

  • Ulrich's Periodicals

Visit the Japanese Clinical Medicine homepage and view the Editor in Chief’s call for papers

share on

Posted in: Indexes, Databases, and Directories

News Categories

RECENT ENTRIES

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
My experience of publishing my article with Libertas Academia was excellent. They professionally handled the review process. The quality of the reviews were high. I look forward to publishing my scientific papers again with Libertas Academia.
Dr Assy Nimmer (Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results