Close
Help
Need Help?



Biomedical Informatics Insights Now Added to Cabell’s Computer Science Directory

Posted Wed, May, 16,2012

Libertas is pleased to announce that Biomedical Informatics Insights is now included in Cabell’s Computer Science Directory.

The Texas based directory helps researchers prepare manuscripts by providing information about submission guidelines, journal aims and scopes, review processes, and submission links.

Cabell’s Computer Science Directory contains current and detailed information on more than 200 journals in 22 different topic areas including artificial intelligence, robotics, and information systems. The directory helps users submit their manuscript to any of the journals included in the directory and is popular with authors and researchers in the US.

Cabell’s is now added to the list of directories that Biomedical Informatics Insights is listed with:

  • Cabell's Computer Science

  • Cabell's Health Administration

  • EBSCO A-Z

  • JournalSeek

  • JournalTOCs

  • OAJSE

  • Pubshub

  • SafetyLit

  • Scirus

  • Ulrich's Periodicals

Visit the Biomedical Informatics Insights homepage and view the Editor in Chief’s call for papers

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I was delighted to submit an invited review on cluster headache pharmacology.  As someone who writes a few papers per year on these subjects, I appreciated that the submission, review and approval process for the paper was smooth and efficient. Our reviewers raised important points that improved the overall quality of the manuscript. Overall a very positive experience.
Dr Michael J. Marmura (Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results