Posted Wed, May, 16,2012
Every paper published in Libertas journals is peer reviewed by two highly qualified peer reviewers. After each peer review is completed we ask the reviewers for their feedback on our peer review process. This helps us to ensure that we're consistently achieving our goal of providing a high quality peer review process.
We asked reviewers to rate their experience in five areas as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor. Here's what they told us:
93% rated instructions on how to undertake a peer review as good or very good
90% rated their communication with Libertas staff as good or very good
91% rated the accessibility of manuscript files as good or very good
92% rated the interface to upload their peer review report as good or very good
93% rated their over-all experience as a peer reviewer as good or very good
See what your colleagues have said about peer reviewing for Libertas journals by reading their testimonials
Thu 23 May, 2013Behavioral Lifestyle Interventions
Thu 23 May, 2013Published This Week (20 to 24 May)
Wed 22 May, 2013Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC/D)
It's a great pleasure to work as peer reviewer for Libertas Academica. The review process is fast and efficient and I strongly recommend the scientific community to consider LA to publish their valuable data.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)