Every paper published in Libertas journals is peer reviewed by two highly qualified peer reviewers.  After each peer review is completed we ask the reviewers for their feedback on our peer review process.  This helps us to ensure that we're consistently achieving our goal of providing a high quality peer review process.  

We asked reviewers to rate their experience in five areas as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor.  Here's what they told us:

• 93% rated instructions on how to undertake a peer review as good or very good

• 90% rated their communication with Libertas staff as good or very good

• 91% rated the accessibility of manuscript files as good or very good

• 92% rated the interface to upload their peer review report as good or very good

• 93% rated their over-all experience as a peer reviewer as good or very good

See what your colleagues have said about peer reviewing for Libertas journals by reading their testimonials