Close
Help
Need Help?



Journals Host Up to 50 MB of Supplementary Files

Posted Tue, May, 22,2012

Libertas journals now host up to 50 MB of supplementary files per article, more than double what other publishers allow.

Authors can include large collections of tables, figures and source code.  Strengthen the credibility of your work by allowing your colleagues to verify your results by including all your data.

Supplementary files will also be permanently archived by CLOCKSS, LOCKSS and our other archiving partners, ensuring its permanent availability.  

Authors without supplementary data can use their allocated space to host a video abstract.  Video abstracts are available to all authors at no charge.

To learn more about the benefits of publishing in Libertas journals visit this page.

share on

Posted in: Libertas Services

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The publication of our paper in Bioinformatics and Biology Insights was highly professional and very pleasant on all levels: the guidelines for authors are concise, the online submission system is user-friendly, the comments from the reviewers were insightful and improved our paper, and the preparation of the manuscript for publication was efficient. I particularly liked the fast feedback from the staff on the state of the submission and review process.
Professor Werner Braun (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results