Close
Help
Need Help?



New Open Access Visibility Information for Biomarkers in Cancer

Posted Wed, May, 23,2012

Articles published in open access journals like Biomarkers in Cancer have been shown to receive more citations that articles published in restricted access journals.

Libertas’ goal is to maximize visibility for all articles published in Biomarkers in Cancer. A recent review of previous research on open access citation levels showed that 87% of previous studies found open access articles were more often cited than restricted access articles.

The citation difference in favor of open access was notably pronounced in certain disciplines, with medicine having a 300-450% difference and agricultural sciences having a 200-600% difference.

This study demonstrates that publishing in open access journals means papers are more visible and more likely to be read and cited.

Visit the Biomarkers in Cancer homepage and view the entire report here

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I have found the process to be quick, timely and effective and the articles reviewed were relevant to my interests indicated in advance.  The necessary time to review the article was provided, and the journal staff have always been quick to ensure any questions have been addressed and my expectations satisfied.  It is with great pleasure that I note this as not only a peer reviewer, but also as an author whom has submitted to ...
Professor Dr Joel Lamoure (University of Western Ontario and University of Toronto, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results