Posted Mon, May, 28,2012
Authors of papers that appear in Clinical Medicine Reviews Journals are encouraged to submit feedback on the process of publishing with Libertas. We ask authors to share their thoughts with us so we can inform others about what it is like to publish with Libertas.
We welcome endorsements, comments, opinions and criticisms relating to the author’s experience publishing in our journals, and any other aspects of our professional service.
Our goal is to make the experience of publishing with Libertas the best it can be. We value authors’ opinions because they help us identify the strengths and weaknesses of our production process. We ask authors for feedback as they know best what publishers can do to make the process as efficient and enjoyable as possible.
Future customers and returning authors benefit from the feedback that we get from authors, as we modify aspects of the production process based on the testimonials we receive.
A recent testimonial from an author in a Clinical Medicine Reviews Journal: "I had an excellent experience publishing our review article in Clinical Medicine Reviews. The managing editor was very helpful and the process was very timely and transparent."
It is encouraging to know that authors enjoy and appreciate this aspect of the publication process, and that we are achieving our aim of making the overall process as smooth and efficient as possible.
See which authors have provided feedback on their experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Reviews Journals
Posted in: Testimonials
Fri 24 May, 2013Article Usage Metrics Now Available for all Journals
Fri 24 May, 2013Treatment of Recurrent HNSCC
Fri 24 May, 2013Bilateral Renal Infarction in a Lupus Patient
The whole process from submission to publication in Genetics & Epigenetics couldn't be smoother. Editors and editorial staff of Libertas have my highest recommendation.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)