Close
Help
Need Help?



New Open Access Visibility Information for Biomedical Informatics Insights

Posted Wed, May, 30,2012

Articles published in open access journals like Biomedical Informatics Insights have been shown to receive more citations that articles published in restricted access journals.

Libertas’ goal is to maximize visibility for all articles published in Biomedical Informatics Insights. A recent review of previous research on open access citation levels showed that 87% of previous studies found open access articles were more often cited than restricted access articles.

The citation difference in favor of open access was notably pronounced in certain disciplines, with medicine having a 300-450% difference and agricultural sciences having a 200-600% difference.

This study demonstrates that publishing in open access journals means papers are more visible and more likely to be read and cited.

Visit the Biomedical Informatics Insights homepage and view the entire report here

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Publishing with Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes was a great experience.  The editors were prompt in updating me with information regarding the status of the manuscript, and answering all questions I had during the publication process.  I was pleased with how little time it took from submission to publication.
Dr Pooja Raghavan (Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Mount Carmel Health, Columbus, OH, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results