Close
Help
Need Help?
Search



Palliative Care: Research and Treatment Now Uses Project Counter Analytics

Posted Thu, Jun, 07,2012

Enhanced visibility is one of the prime advantages to authors of publishing in an open access journal like Palliative Care: Research and Treatment.

One of the ways we measure an article's visibility is the number of views and downloads it receives.  The resulting number is available on the journal's webpages for each article, and by adding those numbers together we obtain the journal's visibility figure.

Counting views and downloads is complicated by the possibility of fraud and automated views by search engines.  To ensure that readers and authors can have confidence in our visibility analytics we have now formally joined Project Counter.  Release 3 of Project Counter's code of practice addresses these and other problems.

Palliative Care: Research and Treatment's membership of Project Counter ensures that readers and authors can trust its visibility analytics.

Visit this page to see the latest visibility information for Palliative Care: Research and Treatment.

share on

Posted in: Open AccessVisibility and Discoverability

News Categories

RECENT ENTRIES

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
It is my pleasure to confirm that we had a very pleasant experience by publishing our article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.  The review process was highly efficient and the reviewers' comments useful and constructive.  I am sure that this is the kind of publication needed by the scientific community.  I am looking forward future collaborations.
Dr Federico Navarro Sarabia (University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results