Posted Mon, Jun, 25,2012
The unofficial impact factor for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.000.
Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is very impressive.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology's respectable unofficial impact factor was made possible by the fact that it is open access, meaning all articles are available online for anyone to read and download for free.
The widely respected editorial board and high quality peer review process have also helped to increase the number of citations and article views for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology.
All articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology will benefit from high readership and citation rates backed up by the journal’s high unofficial impact factor.
This achievement for such a new journal was made possible by the extensive visibility we have established for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology, indexing it in:
Chemical Abstracts Service
Chinese Electronic Periodical Service
Directory of Open Access Journals
EBSCO Academic Search Complete
Gale Academic OneFile
Gale Health Reference Centre
Gale InfoTrac Custom Journals
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Posted in: Impact Factors
Fri 17 May, 2013Ophthalmology and Eye Disease Now on PubMed
Fri 17 May, 2013RNAi Stratagems Against HIV-1
Thu 16 May, 2013Journal of Central Nervous System Disease on PubMed
The submission process for manuscript publication in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research is as easy as A,B,C! Any minor hiccups I encountered were quickly addressed by Libertas' expert staff via prompt emails, and the timelines between initial submission and publication are surely the shortest on record! I will definitely be submitting future manuscripts to this journal, and look forward to working with their professional and expert team.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)