Close
Help
Need Help?



Libertas editorial board member new Computational Biology Institute director

Posted Thu, Jul, 12,2012

Dr Keith Crandall, an Evolutionary Bioinformatics editorial board member was recently named founding director of the George Washington University Computational Biology Institute.

Dr Crandall will direct development at the Computational Biology Institute and implement research and organization plans. The institution will focus on integrative bioinformatics and genomics and is the first of its kind at George Washington University.

Dr Crandall is the principal investigator working on the revolutionary Open Tree of Life project funded by the National Science Foundation. He is also part of the team studying the consequences for coastal ecosystems of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Libertas would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Dr Crandall as his being chosen to lead the institute at George Washington University highlights the quality of Evolutionary Bioinformatics editorial board members.

Visit the journal website and view the full editorial board here

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I truly enjoyed the publishing process with Libertas Academica. The staff were professional, friendly, and efficient. They are good at what they do and I look forward to working with them again for my next paper.
Dr Tina Wu (President, Dr. Wu Clinical Counselling and Consulting Group/Adjunct Professor, Trinity Western University, Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results