Close
Help
Need Help?



Article Visibility in Libertas Open Access Journals

Posted Mon, Jul, 16,2012

Open access journals provide articles published in them with very high levels of visibility.  They compare very favorably against traditional controlled-access journals that restrict article availability to those  researchers who work at subscribing institutions or are able to afford pay-per-view fees.

A good example of the visibility our open access journals offer is "Relationship Between the Plasma Concentration of C-Reactive Protein and Severity of Peripheral Arterial Disease", published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology.  This article has achieved aproximately 14,000 views since publication.

This substantial visibility is also demonstrated by journals like Biomarker Insights and Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology, which have achieved more than 561,000 and 417,000 article views respectively.

To learn more about our journals visit the journals homepage to find your journals of interest.

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
In my opinion the review process in all the Libertas Academica journals I have had the privilege of reviewing papers for is second to none.  The entire process is a click away and all the editorial staff are very cooperative.  The papers that are submitted are of top quality and I am sure the journals will gain the status of high impact journals in a very short time.
Dr C. Shekhar Mayanil (Children's Memorial Research Center, Chicago, IL, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results