Posted Tue, Jul, 24,2012
Articles published in open access journals like Drug Target Insights are more visible and likely to receive more citations than articles published in restricted access journals.
During June, Pubmed Central statistics showed that Libertas Academica has 1,358 papers available for anyone to download for free. These papers received 31,330 views, including 8,020 downloads. The most popular paper was viewed 734 times during the month. Including abstracts, figures, tables, supplementary data, and cited-in lists, Libertas material on the Pubmed Central website was viewed 43,171 times.
In addition to this, articles in Drug Target Insights have now been viewed 167,322 times since 2008 through the Libertas website. This makes up part of the 7,739,051 total article views for all Libertas journals. Articles in Drug Target Insights have also been downloaded more than 48,407 times since 2010. The total number of article downloads for all Libertas journals is 2,473,937.
Being an open access publisher means articles are freely available to everyone, thus increasing the level of visibility for articles published in Drug Target Insights.
Visit the Drug Target Insights homepage and view more statistics here
News Categories
Fri 24 May, 2013
Article Usage Metrics Now Available for all JournalsFri 24 May, 2013
Treatment of Recurrent HNSCCFri 24 May, 2013
Bilateral Renal Infarction in a Lupus PatientThis is the second time I have submitted a paper to Palliative Care: Research and Treatment for possible publication. In both instances, my experience with Libertas Academica was very good from submission to acceptance. The peer reviewers' comments were insightful, very constructive, and extremely helpful. The author interface was user-friendly. The publishing process was fast and convenient. I highly recommend this journal.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube