Close
Help
Need Help?



Human Parasitic Diseases Added to Gale Academic OneFile

Posted Thu, Aug, 02,2012

Libertas is pleased to announce that Human Parasitic Diseases has now been added to Gale's Academic OneFile database.

GALE operates more than 600 databases, including the popular InfoTrac and General Reference series. The Michigan based company is popular with authors working in the USA, so inclusion of Human Parasitic Diseases in GALE's Academic OneFile will increase article visibility in North America.

In addition to it's American popularity, GALE has offices in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand and Latin America. Libertas' partnership with GALE will provide a further strengthening of the already substantial visibility achieved by Human Parasitic Diseases, and make articles published in the journal accessible to an even larger audience around the world.

To see where else the journal is indexed, visit the Human Parasitic Diseases homepage

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced in over 50 publications. The publishing process of this journal was a most pleasant and productive experience. I was particularly impressed with the regular updates of the progress of my submission. My experience with Libertas Academica was excellent.
Dr Ling Hong Tseng, MD (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University of Chang Gung School of Medicine, Taiwan)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results