Close
Help
Need Help?



Environmental Health Insights Now Uses Project Counter Analytics

Posted Mon, Aug, 20,2012

Enhanced visibility is one of the prime advantages to authors of publishing in an open access journal like Environmental Health Insights.

One of the ways we measure an article's visibility is the number of views and downloads it receives.  The resulting number is available on the journal's webpages for each article, and by adding those numbers together we obtain the journal's visibility figure.

Counting views and downloads is complicated by the possibility of fraud and automated views by search engines.  To ensure that readers and authors can have confidence in our visibility analytics we have now formally joined Project Counter.  Release 3 of Project Counter's code of practice addresses these and other problems.

Environmental Health Insights' membership of Project Counter ensures that readers and authors can trust its visibility analytics.

Visit this page to see the latest visibility information for Environmental Health Insights

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
It is an honor to publish in Libertas Academia journals, I strongly recommend researchers to submit their articles.  The entire submission, review and publication process for our article in Retrovirology: Research and Treatment was clear and easy.  The staff explained everything and helped me whenever I asked, they were supportive and very polite.  Comments from reviewers were professional and very helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. Publication fees were reasonable and fair.  As ...
Dr Mqondisi Tshabalala (University of Zimbabwe, Avondale Harare, Zimbabwe)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results