Close
Help
Need Help?



Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine Added to Gale Academic OneFile

Posted Mon, Aug, 20,2012

Libertas is pleased to announce that Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine has now been added to Gale's Academic OneFile database.

GALE operates more than 600 databases, including the popular InfoTrac and General Reference series. The Michigan based company is popular with authors working in the USA, so inclusion of Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine in GALE's Academic OneFile will increase article visibility in North America.

In addition to it's American popularity, GALE has offices in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand and Latin America. Libertas' partnership with GALE will provide a further strengthening of the already substantial visibility achieved by Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine, and make articles published in the journal accessible to an even larger audience around the world.

To see where else the journal is indexed, visit the Clinical Medicine Insights: Trauma and Intensive Medicine homepage

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The team at Evolutionary Bioinformatics were fantastic in everyway. They were very accesible and helped with all aspects of getting the paper published in a timely fashion.  The immediate online help option avaliable through the website is a great option.
Dr Laura Boykin (Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results